|
TONY itinierances CD/download, autres directions
|
|
| In this
our “who cares?”-world, it is hard to find people who give a damn.
That is, they do give a damn, but all of them about different things and
some of those things are so far out or in between that it is hard to make
them out really. Tony is not a loner nor a looner, but his music is hard
to grasp. But then human relationships and their development are usually
hard to grasp. |
|
|
Music concrete has always been
a tough cookie for me and Tony’s recording here is as hard to swallow. I
am not sure of the exact reason, it might just be that in spite of all the
discernible sounds and clear structures, the music itself sits as heavy as a
big brickwall and it seems impossible to get through. Of course, you could
walk around and look at it from the other side, but usually they just look
the same and just as incomprehensible as from where you were before. But to
know what’s inside takes a lot of hard work and research and still you
might bite out a tooth or two. In other words, I can hear the various
keyboard-sounds and the field recordings and the noise sounds mixed in, but
what can I read into it or gather from it remains as unclassifiable and
mysterious as the grimace of an old Chinese man. Moreover, the tracks seem
to mark time a lot. Glissandis of harp-like synthie-sounds cover each other
without changing chords and no discernible harmony seems to arise. Soft
industrial noises wash over each other with unchanging rhythm and slowly
dissolve or don’t. More strange sounds that remind me of how fluegelhorns
were used in late Twenties surreal operas. The music seems to try to keep
away as much as possible from traditional concepts such as harmony, beauty
or any other aesthetic terminology. Is a sentence like “this music just
is” a feasible conclusion? Not in this fanzine. Now, why do I break my review-policy of only writing
about music I like? Actually, I didn’t. While trying to get through this
music, I had a hard time of changing my viewpoints, trying to read it in
various directions, listen to it more carefully (and in instances even less
carefully, thinking maybe it’d work different when only regarded from a
distance and with less concentration) or trying to redefine my own listening
habits and ever so on. Even though that didn’t help a lot, not to say it
remained futile, the challenge was a big but enjoyable one. And even though
I failed, because I really wasn’t able to form a proper opinion on
“itinerances” that I’d want to share with you readers out there, the
way to failure has taught me a few things. Failure isn’t a bad thing in
itself. It is only the fact that the winner is much heralded in our society
that the loser feels bad, but losing is an important experience and one I
have had quite a lot. A few weeks ago we found the dry remains of a bush on
a trash heap near our house and because it still showed some green leaves
here and there, we took it home, cut it down and planted it in our garden.
This week it flowered beautifully and I take that as a thank you. Maybe it all boils down to Tony being a sound designer
and young father and interested in sounds as such more than in music or song
or a somesuch oldfashioned notion and I am trying to read something into
something else that isn’t there. But my own experience with this little
record is real and I don’t think I’ll soon forget it as the record I
wasn’t able to do a proper review on. |
|
www.autresdirections.net/inmusic
9/2005
