|
ARIEL
PINK’S HAUNTED GRAFFITI Worn copy CD/2LP, Paw Tracks
|
|
|
All in all and taking everything into account “worn copy” is
definitely indescribeable. Ariel Pink is once again taking a wild ride
through adolescent’s music of the last three or four decades or even
longer. The production is as mushy as it fits a re-release of an old copy.
Once again the mystery doesn’t get lifted and the story enfolds into
various strands of content each of them with another thousand pages of
hints and connections in themselves and connected to everything else. If I
think about it (it being already late at night) I find this music, though
it doesn’t live up to “The Doldrums” in weirdness and oulandishness,
is a lot like codfish. Think about it. |
|
|
Aww allright, when “The Doldrums” came out, Paw Tracks – the
label somehow around the Animal Collective, don’t ask for details, because
I don’t know – they made us believe that they found Ariel Pink hiding
behind some bushes in the Hollywood hills, a tape grasped in his hands, that
he wanted but didn’t dare to give them. “Recorded in relative
seclusion” it still says on the website. But now the truth is out: instead
of being a newfound, musical Caspar Hauser or Mogli, child of the jungle,
Ariel Pink already had a proper release under his own name out on Rhystop
records. I’ll admit that this had happened in a rather obvious clandestiny
and on a really smale scale, even if compared to Paw Tracks. And I also know
that “The Doldrums” had already been released as a CD-R years back. But still I wonder, why did nobody ever mention this
first lp. Finding holes such as this in press-releases always gets me going
in theories, which might be more or less conspiratorial, but see yourself:
Maybe the label just didn’t know any better. Or maybe Ariel Pink never
told them. Or Ariel Pink doesn’t even really exist and this is just to
hide some project from some artist who doesn’t want to be known (who could
it be? Thurston Moore? Ariel Rosenberg? Don Van Vliet? Ted Nugent? Kurt
Cobain?). Maybe the material recorded sounded so outdated somehow that Paw
Tracks decided to call it a re-release. Or maybe they just had a lot of fun
doing it. You see, I like to get on my horse and ride away in all
directions. And Ariel Pink or whoever would happily be my company.
I have read the phrase “a ride through musical history” or “taking up
stuff from all genres” a lot in reviews, but nowhere did it ever fit
better than here. The list would start somewhere and then implode in spirals
somewhere in the mid Seventies (without ever touching anything close to
modern electronic music, that is the only fixed point). Like this: Rush,
Beach Boys, Donna Summers, Pink Floyd, Creation, Buffalo Springfield, Neu!,
The Byrds, Jesus and the Mary Chain, Plastic Bertrand, Wilson Pickett,
Rolling Stones, Sebadoh, Kim Fowley, Set Fire To Flames, America, Eric
Burdon (in his psychedelic phase), homolka, Lutefisk, Neil Diamond, Peter
Frampton, Ten Years After, Uriah Heep, Toto, Yes, Van der Graaf Generator,
X, Psychedelic Furs, Enola Gay, Guided by Voices, Harry Pussy, Gary Numan,
Lionel Ritchie, Frank Zappa, Oliver Onions, Bevis Frond, and ever and ever
so on. I’ll stop now before you get the impression that I am just trying
to waste webspace to make this review longer. You get the drift. The
rhizomatic spreading of ideas, that seems to come from within an off itself
without being set off by outer influences, which of course, is not at all
possible, because somewhere in our lives we all get exposed to
radio-radiation or top of the pops on tv. So it seems all mixed into one
vision in here and everything seems to be mixed into this vision. This is the first time I will really try to describe a
record by telling what it isn’t and you can be sure, that whatever is
missing out is somewhere on here: “worn copy” is not an electronica
record or a hip hop record. It is not tied to a single style, unless you
don’t count the music aequivalent to obsessive compulsive trashcollecting
as a single style. It is not clean or crisply produced, and the production
is not on a distinct level but changes here and there. There are no
Top40-hitsingles on there and by itself the single songs don’t seem to bee
too far out or too avantgarde, so they keep within known structures, though
they try to get around any kind of border by all means they can find. This
won’t ever be a popular alternative rock record. It also won’t be one of
those records, that over time will build up a big following, like “Trout
Mask Replica”, and find its place in the musical canon. More likely, there
will be a handful of people who will remember it as a true beauty of
weirdness and psychedelic tomfoolery. The rest, except for the fact that it
is a rather long record, without getting boring, is beyond me. And what
better can you say about a record. But I’d like to see a concert with Harry Merry and
Ariel Pink performing together and The Reynols as a backup-band. That would
be bliss and revelation at the same time. Please, make it happen. |
|
4/2005
