QUEENS OF THE STONE AGE
Songs for the deafCD/LP, Interscope |
|
| This
is the number one record of this year for cultivated over-speeding on
highways. “songs for the deaf” will make you press down the
accelerator without even noticing. But the best thing is: The Queens of
The Stone Age, even though this record is “record of the month” in
almost every music-magazine and alternative station worldwide, still
define their very own kind of rock-music. They won’t be labelled, they
record great music, and still they are commercially successful (or at
least the top-sellers within the Heavy/Rock-genre) and that doesn’t
happen a lot. |
|
|
Josh
Homme said “I’d rather be a small part of something great, than a big
part of a pile of shit.” ‘nuff said. Ever
wondered, why there is a car-stereo on the innersleeve of this record? One
that has knobs for “loud” and “louder” only? Not really, huh. The
quality of rock-music still defines itself by two measures. On the one hand,
it should have the tendency to make you turn the volume up. It has to be
loud and even louder. That is where the stupid contest for “loudest band
in the world” comes from (the title is held since ages ago by Motorhead by
pure stubbornness). The other measure is: does the music affect your driving
in following ways: makes you go faster, makes you turn corners sharper,
makes you drive more reckless, makes you want to drive on and on for ever on
an endless highway. “songs for the deaf” is perfect in all measures.
This is the record to get up in the morning to and to put in your car to
listen to while driving. Sure, that is a very American notion, beginning
from the Fifties and “cruisin’ with the radio on” right through the
Seventies (”Davies on the road again”) and Eighties (almost every song
by Bruce Springsteen) up to being stuck in traffic jams on your
90-minute-commute to work. I don’t care about America, or to be more
precise: about the USA. That war-mongering, arrogant, idiot-governed centre
of the hell of commercialism and globalism. No, I don’t think Europe is
any better, but it easy to spit against the USA so I’ll use that to make a
few lines. Just one more point: don’t ever buy these “music for the
road”-CD-Boxes that are advertised on television. You won’t ever find
the feeling of the road in there. All you’re gonna find is a bunch of
shit. You’ll only find the feeling of the road on the road (duh!) and
you’ll make it a little better and a lot more intense with “songs for
the deaf”. The
Queens of the Stone Age have their very own guitar sound and style of
writing music. They are unique and that might be the best thing about them.
Plus, that their style and sound are driving, energy-loaded and pleasurable
to listen to. If you have your own style and that style is shitty then the
best thing you can hope for is being called an eccentric, but there is worse
waiting for you up the road. Even on a rather straight song such as “go
with the flow” (which is going to be the second single-outtake I promise
you) you’ll easily recognise them. So, I’ll only compare them to one
other band and that only because this other band also has their very own
style, this other band also rocks, and this other band is one of the
greatest bands around ever: The Melvins. There is nothing bad about being
compared to another band on these reasons is there? There is also nothing
bad about a statement like: “there is nothing bad about this record”,
except maybe the inherent question about the next record. But that question
is typically for a certain brood of music-journalists, who take themselves
and their work for much more important than the music they have to write
about. Because what is mattering right here and now is the current record,
right before us. And this one is great. On
“songs for the deaf” you will find a variety of different influences /
roots / styles which are all combined within the style of QOTSA, which is to
say: no boredom and high level of quality-roc throughout. I wouldn’t
differentiate between the songs in terms of slower and faster, but rather in
mellower and extremer. “Another love song” for instance sounds as if it
was taken from some Sixties-vault, while “songs for the deaf” has this
beautiful melody and whining singing that makes it something like a
stoner-ballad, though it is broken after some time. There is even a hidden
sort-of-folk-song hidden on the CD. No, no, no, it is not possible to
describe this record in the common terms of music writing – but it will be
fun reading the hopeless tries of the whole mass of untalented music-writers
who will fail, fail, fail. But not as much fun as listening to this record. P.S.:
I’d like to think about Dave Grohl and the life he leads at the moment.
Because I think that he has the best life you can imagine. Surely, he
doesn’t have to work for money anymore. All the musical projects he starts
for fun turn out highly successful (within bounds..), he is a great drummer
and gets paid for it. Man, I envy him. |
|
08/2002